the outrage at Mbeki’s stance on HIV came from white liberal establishments who had bought a story sold by America – Drs Anthony Brink and Chris Rawlins

Thabo M MbekiAnthony Brink and Chris Rawlins, have come out in support of former president Thabo Mbeki’s views on HIV/Aids.

Brink, who has written several research books on the treatment of HIV including his most noted book Debating AZT: Mbeki and the AIDS drug controversy, said Mbeki was correct in what he wrote in his recent open letter.

“What he [Mbeki] said was the truth. The moon isn’t made of cheese and a virus doesn’t cause a syndrome,” Brink said.

Brink said the outrage at Mbeki’s stance on HIV came from white liberal establishments who had bought a story sold by America.

“The outrage comes from the people who are our ‘friends’. These are the white liberalist establishment, the principally colonised and Christian Africans who bought the story from America.” he said.

Brink said he and Rawlins had all the information which supported Mbeki’s view on HIV and Aids on their Treatment Information Group (TIG) website.

Mbeki mentions Rawlins on his Facebook page, posting a link to his recent article challenging a Harvard University article which argued that the South African government under the Mbeki administration was responsible for deaths of many by refusing to accept available anti-retrovirals (ARVs).

In his article on the TIG website, Rawlins said this analysis demonstrated that there was no link between HIV tests and child mortality. He said the HIV/Aids hypothesis was a mathematical impossibility.

“It’s really sad that there is such indoctrination and brain washing in South Africa after we have gone through the third world experience for so many years. What most South Africans don’t appreciate is the huge growing body of scientists who absolutely reject this as nonsense,” Rawlins said.

In his open letter on Monday, Mbeki said he had never claimed that HIV did not cause Aids. “This false accusation was made by people who benefitted from trumpeting the slogan ‘HIV causes Aids’ as though this was a religious edict,” he wrote.

Mbeki wrote that what he said instead was that a virus cannot cause a syndrome.

During his tenure, the former president was accused of denialism when it came to the issue of HIV/Aids.

“Aids is an acronym for ‘Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome’ – therefore Aids is a syndrome, i.e. a collection of well-known diseases, with well-known causes. They are not, together, caused and cannot be caused by one virus!

“I said that HIV might be a contributory cause of immune deficiency – the ID in Aids!,” Mbeki wrote.

Mbeki said in 2006 that HIV was the ninth leading cause of death in South Africa, while tuberculosis was at the top, according to StatsSA.

Mbeki has come in for harsh criticism by the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) over his views on HIV/Aids.

In a statement this week, the TAC said the impact of Mbeki’s Aids denialism had been catastrophic.


3 thoughts on “the outrage at Mbeki’s stance on HIV came from white liberal establishments who had bought a story sold by America – Drs Anthony Brink and Chris Rawlins”

  1. When the child of a wealthy 1st world parent is HIV+ they get the best treatment money can buy to ensure the longevity of their child. However this very same treatment is clearly not good enough for the child of an unemployed parent living in Africa.


  2. The explanation by Brink and Rawlins make sense. The problem with former president Mbeki is that he is not combative and argumentative. Had he been persistent from the onset, perhaps we would be sitting with a completely different narrative of this controversy.

    I must admit that I was one of those that had written him off as being unreasonable and irrational on the HIV/AIDS issue. But having checked his response, looked at his article and the statement of his backers; most importantly, having focused on the definitions of the terminologies in question, I agree that Mr Mbeki was right when he said “a virus cannot cause a syndrome”. Put differently, perhaps so as to be better understood, he should have said A SINGLE VIRUS CANNOT CAUSE A SYNDROME. The crux of the matter lies in understanding what is meant by SYNDROME – “a collection of well-known diseases, with well-known causes”.

    The controvery is misplaced. The argument seems to latch on whether HIV causes AIDS, instead of saying it contributes to AIDS. ARVs combat HIV, NOT AIDS! They address the HIV element of AIDS only. That is why AIDS is incurable. Mbeki’s approach, as a statesman, was holistic, addressing AIDS, the syndrome, and not an element of the syndrome.

    Where Mbeki failed the people was in not setting up a temporary measure, a stopgap to stem the tide of AIDS while a holistic measure was being sought. So what he is defending himself on, and what he is being attacked on is irrelevant, purely a technicality. He is correct on that score, and his detractors are wrong on what they are accusing him off. The real issue is that he failed to stem the tide of HIV/AIDS. Thousands died on his watch when he could have done more to curtail the onslaught.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s